Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > We still use `--standard-notes` but this option has no use and is no > longer documented anywhere. > > Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > revision.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/revision.c b/revision.c > index a0ab7fb784..24219c741a 100644 > --- a/revision.c > +++ b/revision.c > @@ -2529,6 +2529,7 @@ static int handle_revision_opt(struct rev_info *revs, int argc, const char **arg > enable_default_display_notes(&revs->notes_opt, > &revs->show_notes); > revs->notes_opt.use_default_notes = -1; > + /* Deprecated */ > } else if (!strcmp(arg, "--no-standard-notes")) { > revs->notes_opt.use_default_notes = 0; > } else if (!strcmp(arg, "--oneline")) { With the placement of this new comment, it is unclear which one between "--standard-notes" and "--no-standard-notes" is getting deprecated (actually, the comment is placed inside the block for the former, so it may be more natural to interpret that the comment marks the former as deprecated). } else if (!strcmp(arg, "--no-standard-notes")) { + /* Deprecated */ revs->notes_opt.use_default_notes = 0; } I am not commenting if it makes sense to declare that the option is deprecated here---I'll leave it to others to argue for/against it. The usual reasoning to add/maintain "--no-foo" is so that we can get "cmd --foo --no-foo" to naturally work, but it does not apply here?