Re: [PATCH 2/3] replace-objects: create wrapper around setting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 12:50 PM Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 6/1/2023 12:35 PM, Victoria Dye wrote:
> > Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget wrote:
> >> From: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> >> diff --git a/replace-object.h b/replace-object.h
> >> index 7786d4152b0..b141075023e 100644
> >> --- a/replace-object.h
> >> +++ b/replace-object.h
> >> @@ -27,6 +27,19 @@ void prepare_replace_object(struct repository *r);
> >>  const struct object_id *do_lookup_replace_object(struct repository *r,
> >>                                               const struct object_id *oid);
> >>
> >> +
> >> +/*
> >> + * Some commands disable replace-refs unconditionally, and otherwise each
> >> + * repository could alter the core.useReplaceRefs config value.
> >> + *
> >> + * Return 1 if and only if all of the following are true:
> >> + *
> >> + *  a. disable_replace_refs() has not been called.
> >> + *  b. GIT_NO_REPLACE_OBJECTS is unset or zero.
> >> + *  c. the given repository does not have core.useReplaceRefs=false.
> >> + */
> >> +int replace_refs_enabled(struct repository *r);
> >
> > Since the purpose of this function is to access global state, would
> > 'environment.[c|h]' be a more appropriate place for it (and
> > 'disable_replace_refs()', for that matter)? There's also some precedent;
> > 'set_shared_repository()' and 'get_shared_repository()' have a very similar
> > design to what you've added here.
>
> That's an interesting idea that I had not considered. My vague sense
> is that it is worth isolating the functionality to this header instead
> of lumping it into the giant environment.h header, but I've CC'd
> Elijah (who is leading a lot of this header organization stuff) to see
> if he has an opinion on this matter.

I haven't really formed much of an opinion on the sea of globals in
environment.h and elsewhere beyond "I sure wish we didn't have so many
globals".  Maybe I should have an opinion on it, but there was plenty
to clean up without worrying about all of those.  :-)




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux