Taylor Blau <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > OK, having now read both completely, I would say I have a vague > preference for my version since it keeps the include at the top and > unconditional, and has slightly more information in the patch message. > > But I do not prefer it so much over yours that I would be sad if you had > already queued yours and didn't want to bother shuffling it around. I do not have much preference between the two, either. Both lack one important description that we are reasonably confident that this breakage is limited to run-command.c and no other files. Thanks.
