Sergey Organov <sorganov@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > No problem from my side, but are you sure? Absolutely. I've seen people just say "we document a failed one" and leave it at that, without attempting to fix. I am trying to see if pushing back at first would serve as a good way to encourage these known failure to be fixed, without accumulating too many expect_failure in our test suite, which will waste cycles at CI runs (which do not need to be reminded something is known to be broken). I will try not to do this when I do not positively know the author of such a patch is capable enough to provide a fix, though, and you are unlucky enough to have shown your abilities in the past ;-) Thanks.
