Rubén Justo <rjusto@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > The initial and main intention in this series is to avoid some confusing > errors operating with orphan branches, when working with worktrees. > ... > In this iteration, v5, I've reverted some of those major refactorings, > mainly the inlining, because it ended up introducing unnecessary > complexity for minimal benefit in this series. Maybe those refactorings > make more sense in future series. > > A new test has been introduced, in 1/5, to notice if a behavior change > similar to that observed in v4, is reintroduced in the future. > > Other than that, no functional changes are expected from v2. This has not seen any activities since it was posted; presumably the issues raised during the review of the previous round have all been addressed? Is everybody happy to see us declare victory and merge it down to 'next'? I see everybody who commented on earlier iterations of the series are CC'ed, so let's hear from them (and others who may be interested). Thanks.
