Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] negotiator/default: avoid stack overflow

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Han Xin <hanxin.hx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> This series avoid stack overflow in negotiator/default.c and memory leak
> in negotiator/skipping.c.
>
> Changes since v2:
> * Rewrite the commit link in the typical format.
> * Fix the incorrect check for the COMMON bit introduced in v2.

I see Derrick pointed out a logic error during the review of v2 and
this round corrects it.  Is everybody happy with this iteration and
considers it safe to merge it to 'next'?

Thanks.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux