N_() is meant to be used on strings that are subsequently _()'d, which
isn't the case here.
The affected construct is a bit questionable from an i18n perspective,
as it pieces together a sentence from separate strings. However, it
doesn't appear to be that bad, as the "assembly instructions" are in a
translatable message as well. Lacking specific complaints from
translators, it doesn't seem worth changing this.
Signed-off-by: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@xxxxxx>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>
---
v2:
- mention the word puzzle in the commit message
---
sequencer.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sequencer.c b/sequencer.c
index 3be23d7ca2..0677c9ab09 100644
--- a/sequencer.c
+++ b/sequencer.c
@@ -3628,7 +3628,7 @@ static int do_exec(struct repository *r, const char *command_line)
" git rebase --continue\n"
"\n"),
command_line,
- dirty ? N_("and made changes to the index and/or the "
+ dirty ? _("and made changes to the index and/or the "
"working tree\n") : "");
if (status == 127)
/* command not found */
--
2.40.0.152.g15d061e6df
