Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Corrected commit date should be equal to commit date unless there > is clock skew causing a commit to be older than its parent, (or > we have a path of commits with equal commit date) so I don't > anticipate that being helpful in general. Yes, exactly. For normal cases it should not matter. I was wondering if the current --date-order shows commits in an order that end-users find unnatural in a branchy history with many commits that have wrong commit dates, and if so, tweaking the date-order to instead use the corrected commit date may help and if so how much. Thanks.
