Re: Commit graph not using minimal number of columns

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> To adapt this algorithm to a newer, dynamic ordering that cares about
> minimizing the rendered graph, I don't think changing the priority
> queue comparison would be sufficient. Something deeper would be
> required and would be quite messy.

Oh, I wasn't thinking about "graph-friendly" at all.  

I was wondering if we replaced --date-order implementation with
corrected commit date from the generation number work would give us
a better output order that users would expect in general (with or
without --graph).





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux