Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 03:37:05PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> > I'm actually not sure if the final patch is a good idea or not, but >> > certainly all of the fixes leading up to it are worth doing. >> >> Thanks; this must have been a lot of work. From the "test what the >> end users use, or at least something close to it" standpoint, 16/16 >> certainly is the right thing to do, I would think. > > Yeah. My main concern is that we are now using SSL by default in the > test suite (or at least trying to; I _think_ we should fail gracefully, > but since it works on my system, I don't have any data beyond the fact > that CI seems OK with it). I think it's one of those things where we try > it and see if anybody screams. True. If a platform has TLS/SSL implementation of acceptable quality and if we fail to build with it, that is something we want to learn about and help them make it work anyway, I suspect. Thanks.
