Re: [PATCH 0/16] http test bug potpourri

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 03:37:05PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> > I'm actually not sure if the final patch is a good idea or not, but
> > certainly all of the fixes leading up to it are worth doing.
> 
> Thanks; this must have been a lot of work.  From the "test what the
> end users use, or at least something close to it" standpoint, 16/16
> certainly is the right thing to do, I would think.

Yeah. My main concern is that we are now using SSL by default in the
test suite (or at least trying to; I _think_ we should fail gracefully,
but since it works on my system, I don't have any data beyond the fact
that CI seems OK with it). I think it's one of those things where we try
it and see if anybody screams.

-Peff



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux