Re: A summary of in-flight topics

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 2:37 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
>  - ab/sequencer-unleak                                          01-18          #8

Perhaps move to "Expecting a hopefully minor and final reroll"?  See
e.g. https://lore.kernel.org/git/xmqqedry17r4.fsf@gitster.g/ where you
commented on Phillip's approving the code changes but wanting a number
of commit message cleanups and fixes.  Ævar did send a v3, and Phillip
commented on two of those patches, suggesting one could still use some
commit message cleanups.

>  - ab/various-leak-fixes                                        01-18         #19

Isn't this already merged as 9ea1378d04 ("Merge branch
'ab/various-leak-fixes'", 2022-12-14) ?  Why does it appear under
"needing review"?  (I started reviewing, and while looking at the
existing code noted it already had the relevant changes, then went
digging and found it was merged...)

> Will merge to 'master'.
>  + en/rebase-update-refs-needs-merge-backend                    01-22/01-23    #9

I sent out a v5 since you sent this email, to include some final
changes Phillip was suggesting.  He seems happy with those
(https://lore.kernel.org/git/94deff87-a4a0-e937-7549-3e5348361a12@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/),
so I agree it can merge down, but please use v5 instead of v4.

> Will merge to 'next'?
>  - en/ls-files-doc-update                                       01-13          #4

I'm in favor, but self votes don't count so...




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux