Re: [CI]: Is t7527 known to be flakey?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [CI]: Is t7527 known to be flakey?
From: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 19:12:16 +0100
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>, Jeff Hostetler <jeffhostetler@xxxxxxxxxx>, edecosta@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <f7449e73-7f50-67ea-2be4-2037f98a69f3@jeffhostetler.com>
References: <xmqqtu0lzzn2.fsf@gitster.g> <20230121102355.GA2155@szeder.dev> <f7449e73-7f50-67ea-2be4-2037f98a69f3@jeffhostetler.com>

On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 11:56:53AM -0500, Jeff Hostetler wrote:
> Was this on Linux or MacOS ?

On an average-ish Linux (an Ubuntu LTS variant).  So the issue is not
specific to musl.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [CI]: Is t7527 known to be flakey?
  - From: Jeff Hostetler

References:
- [CI]: Is t7527 known to be flakey?
  - From: Junio C Hamano
- Re: [CI]: Is t7527 known to be flakey?
  - From: SZEDER Gábor
- Re: [CI]: Is t7527 known to be flakey?
  - From: Jeff Hostetler

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 01/10] bundle: optionally skip reachability walk
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 01/10] bundle: optionally skip reachability walk
Previous by thread: Re: [CI]: Is t7527 known to be flakey?
Next by thread: Re: [CI]: Is t7527 known to be flakey?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Development] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux