Re: [PATCH] treewide: always have a valid "index_state.repo" member

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/17/2023 8:57 AM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
 
> This an updated verison of the 6/6 of [A], which per Junio's [B]
> wasn't picked up with those patches, which are now in "next".
> 
> Junio: Now that Derrick's ds/omit-trailing-hash-in-index has landed on
> "master" this can be applied on top a merge of "master" and what you
> have in "ab/cache-api-cleanup" (that topic itself being based on a
> too-old "master").
> 
> Since the v2 I changed the "Complete the double-reference" logic in
> repo_read_index() so that we're not working around a state of a
> affairs that no longer exists with this change.
> 
> A. https://lore.kernel.org/git/cover-v2-0.6-00000000000-20230112T124842Z-avarab@xxxxxxxxx/
> B. https://lore.kernel.org/git/xmqqtu0u2q9u.fsf@gitster.g/
> 
> Range-diff:

These changes look good to me. Thanks for dealing with the branch-
hopping.

Thanks,
-Stolee




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux