Re: [PATCH] ls-files: add %(skipworktree) atom to format option

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Elijah Newren <newren@xxxxxxxxx> 于2023年1月13日周五 12:44写道:
>
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 11:58 AM Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Elijah Newren <newren@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >
> > > Given my above comments, I personally don't buy this as justification
> > > for adding a new way of reporting on the skip-worktree bit.  It may
> > > still make sense to add this feature or something like it, but I
> > > personally think it deserves separate justification from "`ls-files
> > > -t` is semi-deprecated".
> > > ...
> > > To be honest, I don't yet see any compelling reason to use this new
> > > option.  Even if this patch is accepted, I'd just continue using "git
> > > ls-files -t" (both directly and in scripts) in preference to this.
> > > However, you have inspired me to try to fix up the ls-files
> > > documentation and remove the "semi-deprecated" label for the -t
> > > option.
> >
> > Thanks.  I think that would be the better way forward between the
> > two (i.e. adding this one-shot new feature vs resurrecting -t).
>
> Submitted over here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/git/pull.1463.git.1673584914.gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx/

Thanks, I will check them later.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux