Elijah Newren <newren@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Given my above comments, I personally don't buy this as justification > for adding a new way of reporting on the skip-worktree bit. It may > still make sense to add this feature or something like it, but I > personally think it deserves separate justification from "`ls-files > -t` is semi-deprecated". > ... > To be honest, I don't yet see any compelling reason to use this new > option. Even if this patch is accepted, I'd just continue using "git > ls-files -t" (both directly and in scripts) in preference to this. > However, you have inspired me to try to fix up the ls-files > documentation and remove the "semi-deprecated" label for the -t > option. Thanks. I think that would be the better way forward between the two (i.e. adding this one-shot new feature vs resurrecting -t).
