Re: Gitorious should use CRC128 / 256 / 512 instead of SHA-1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Gitorious should use CRC128 / 256 / 512 instead of SHA-1
From: Hans Petter Selasky <hps@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2023 17:18:40 +0100
Cc: rsbecker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <a2e6fdc3-fbb0-821c-078f-1ad4e55dc8e3@selasky.org>
References: <39dd1a00-786b-acf5-8a40-2425f7dab6cc@selasky.org> <20230113133059.snyjblh3sz2wzcnd@carbon> <446984f6-0d2e-04da-11a3-8b1481fac953@selasky.org> <009701d9275a$678416b0$368c4410$@nexbridge.com> <8a8fbe42-7809-f3e7-b233-6bef790254e1@selasky.org> <20230113154516.jxm2cer4sogatayp@meerkat.local> <d087568b-919e-61f8-c203-e59a2e0572c6@selasky.org> <20230113160218.d3nsoxpbrxrrszhz@meerkat.local> <a2e6fdc3-fbb0-821c-078f-1ad4e55dc8e3@selasky.org>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.1

On 1/13/23 17:06, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:

What's the point? Only so that one party can stay in control?


Let me phrase it like this:

You clearly believe in the zero-trust principle. I don't.

Why can't git support both beliefs, and it can be configurable somehow then?

--HPS

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Gitorious should use CRC128 / 256 / 512 instead of SHA-1
  - From: Konstantin Ryabitsev

References:
- Gitorious should use CRC128 / 256 / 512 instead of SHA-1
  - From: Hans Petter Selasky
- Re: Gitorious should use CRC128 / 256 / 512 instead of SHA-1
  - From: Konstantin Khomoutov
- Re: Gitorious should use CRC128 / 256 / 512 instead of SHA-1
  - From: Hans Petter Selasky
- RE: Gitorious should use CRC128 / 256 / 512 instead of SHA-1
  - From: rsbecker
- Re: Gitorious should use CRC128 / 256 / 512 instead of SHA-1
  - From: Hans Petter Selasky
- Re: Gitorious should use CRC128 / 256 / 512 instead of SHA-1
  - From: Konstantin Ryabitsev
- Re: Gitorious should use CRC128 / 256 / 512 instead of SHA-1
  - From: Hans Petter Selasky
- Re: Gitorious should use CRC128 / 256 / 512 instead of SHA-1
  - From: Konstantin Ryabitsev
- Re: Gitorious should use CRC128 / 256 / 512 instead of SHA-1
  - From: Hans Petter Selasky

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] docs: link generating patch sections
Next by Date: Re: Gitorious should use CRC128 / 256 / 512 instead of SHA-1
Previous by thread: Re: Gitorious should use CRC128 / 256 / 512 instead of SHA-1
Next by thread: Re: Gitorious should use CRC128 / 256 / 512 instead of SHA-1
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Development] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users]