Re: Gitorious should use CRC128 / 256 / 512 instead of SHA-1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/13/23 14:30, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 01:59:44PM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:

Currently GIT only supports cryptographic hashes for its commit tags.
[...]

https://github.com/git/git/blob/9bf691b78cf906751e65d65ba0c6ffdcd9a5a12c/Documentation/technical/hash-function-transition.txt

It's not clear why are you referring to Gitorious in your mail's subject and
then talk about Git.


Hi,

I thought that Git was short for Gitorious? My bad.

The document you refer to really highlights my concerns, that a strong cryptographic hash algorithm is the highway to hell.

Do _not_ use a cryptographic hash for Git. Use plain good old CRC hashes.

Just imagine the consequences of finding child porn inside a 10-year old firmware binary blob in the Linux kernel. Will you just ignore it, or will you fix it?

That's why I say, that it must be possible to forge the hashes by default.

--HPS



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux