Re: Gitorious should use CRC128 / 256 / 512 instead of SHA-1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 02:39:37PM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> Just imagine the consequences of finding child porn inside a 10-year old
> firmware binary blob in the Linux kernel. Will you just ignore it, or will
> you fix it?

How do you expect something like this would happen? A much more likely
scenario would be someone contributing a binary blob that doesn't actually
allow redistribution, and therefore would need to be purged from the
repository.

When something like this happens, everyone is given a heads-up, the history is
rewritten, and everyone moves on. It's a fairly routine procedure -- ask
anyone who's ever committed an API key into their repo.

Git supports history edits and everyone lives with it just fine -- I think you
are under the impression that git is some kind of globally distributed
blockchain where any history edit requires a consensus fork. It's not at all
the case.

-K



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux