Re: [PATCH v6 2/4] worktree add: refactor opt exclusion tests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jacob Abel <jacobabel@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Yes for these particular tests that should be acceptable. I tried putting an
> alternative together that still provides an avenue for handling quoted
> arguments without the helper [1]. Would this work?
>
> 1. https://lore.kernel.org/git/20221229063823.ij3jjuaar2fsayju@phi/

Do we even need to handle an argument with $IFS whitespaces in it in
these tests?  

If not, using "$@" where we pass the args to the commands we run,
and using "$*" where we merely use it for human readable messages,
would be sufficient.






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux