On Sat, Dec 17, 2022 at 1:33 AM Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > diff --git a/attr.c b/attr.c > > index 42ad6de8c7..99883024ec 100644 > > --- a/attr.c > > +++ b/attr.c > > @@ -11,8 +11,13 @@ > > #include "exec-cmd.h" > > #include "attr.h" > > #include "dir.h" > > +#include "git-compat-util.h" > > Unneeded. cf. Documentation/CodingGuidelines > > - The first #include in C files, except in platform specific compat/ > implementations, must be either "git-compat-util.h", "cache.h" or > "builtin.h". You do not have to include more than one of these. > > and this file already begins with including "cache.h". > Thanks, I thought this was removed. > By the way, > > $ make > $ cd t > $ sh t0003-attributes.sh -i -x > Initialized empty Git repository in /home/gitster/w/git.git/t/trash directory.t0003-attributes/.git/ > expecting success of 0003.1 'open-quoted pathname': > echo "\"a test=a" >.gitattributes && > attr_check a unspecified > > ++ echo '"a test=a' > ++ attr_check a unspecified > ++ attr_check_basic a unspecified > ++ path=a > ++ expect=unspecified > ++ git_opts= > ++ git check-attr test -- a > t0003-attributes.sh: line 9: 1508946 Segmentation fault git $git_opts check-attr test -- "$path" > actual 2> err > error: last command exited with $?=139 > not ok 1 - open-quoted pathname > # > # echo "\"a test=a" >.gitattributes && > # attr_check a unspecified > # > 1..1 > $ exit > > there seems to be something fishy in this patch. > Seems to be because tree_oid is not NULL initialized. I think I only tested the new feature, but the other tests are failing. Should be fixed with -+ struct object_id tree_oid; ++ struct object_id *tree_oid = NULL; int cnt, i, doubledash, filei; if (!is_bare_repository()) @@ builtin/check-attr.c: int cmd_check_attr(int argc, const char **argv, const char } } -+ if (revision) -+ if (repo_get_oid_tree(the_repository, revision, &tree_oid)) ++ if (revision) { ++ tree_oid = xmalloc(sizeof(struct object_id)); ++ ++ if (repo_get_oid_tree(the_repository, revision, tree_oid)) + error("%s: not a valid revision", revision); ++ } will include in version 4. Thanks for the support, Junio. -- - Karthik