Re: [PATCH 6/7] Bisect: factorise "bisect_{bad,good,dunno}" into "bisect_state".

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Dscho,

Le lundi 15 octobre 2007, Johannes Schindelin a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Christian Couder wrote:
> >
> > But the new "bisect_state" takes one more argument, because the first
> > one must be "good" "bad" or "dunno".
> >
> > So when there is only one argument HEAD is used, and when there are 2
> > arguments, $2 is used as the good|bad|dunno rev.
>
> Ah, that explains it!  But do you not need to do "2,bad|2,good|2,dunno"
> in that case?  Or even better: "2,*"?

Perhaps it would be an improvement at least in speed for "2,good" 
or "2,dunno".

I wanted to keep exactly the same processing as there was before, in case 
something like "git bisect good v1.5.3.3..v1.5.3.4" was supported. But it 
seems it doesn't work. I don't know if it's a bug or a feature.

Christian.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux