On 12/12/2022 8:43 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > * ds/packed-refs-v2 (2022-11-07) 30 commits > - refs: skip hashing when writing packed-refs v2 > - p1401: create performance test for ref operations > - ci: run GIT_TEST_PACKED_REFS_VERSION=2 in some builds > - t*: skip packed-refs v2 over http tests > - t3210: require packed-refs v1 for some tests > - t5502: add PACKED_REFS_V1 prerequisite > - t5312: allow packed-refs v2 format > - t1409: test with packed-refs v2 > - packed-backend: create GIT_TEST_PACKED_REFS_VERSION > - packed-refs: write prefix chunks > - packed-refs: read optional prefix chunks > - packed-refs: read file format v2 > - packed-refs: write file format version 2 > - packed-backend: create shell of v2 writes > - config: add config values for packed-refs v2 > - packed-backend: create abstraction for writing refs > - packed-backend: extract iterator/updates merge > - packed-backend: extract add_write_error() > - refs: extract packfile format to new file > - chunk-format: parse trailing table of contents > - chunk-format: allow trailing table of contents > - chunk-format: store chunk offset during write > - chunk-format: document trailing table of contents > - chunk-format: number of chunks is optional > - refs: allow loose files without packed-refs > - repository: wire ref extensions to ref backends > - config: fix multi-level bulleted list > - extensions: add refFormat extension > - read-cache: add index.computeHash config option > - hashfile: allow skipping the hash function > > Waiting for review. > Seems to break CI. > linux-TEST-vars > cf. https://github.com/git/git/actions/runs/3598165328 > source: <pull.1408.git.1667846164.gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> Please eject this series. It was only an RFC on purpose, and the first few patches have been replaced with a new series [1] (which I will send a new version of soon) [1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/pull.1439.git.1670433958.gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx/ Meanwhile, Keanen Wold and I are discussing with John Cai about capacity around ref storage mechanisms. I also haven't had time to do the deep-dive on reftable that I promised. Thanks, -Stolee
