Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] credential: add WWW-Authenticate header to cred requests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2022-10-28 11:22, Jeff Hostetler wrote:
> On 10/21/22 1:07 PM, Matthew John Cheetham via GitGitGadget wrote:
>> From: Matthew John Cheetham <mjcheetham@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Add the value of the WWW-Authenticate response header to credential
>> requests. Credential helpers that understand and support HTTP
>> authentication and authorization can use this standard header (RFC 2616
>> Section 14.47 [1]) to generate valid credentials.
>>
>> WWW-Authenticate headers can contain information pertaining to the
>> authority, authentication mechanism, or extra parameters/scopes that are
>> required.
>>
>> The current I/O format for credential helpers only allows for unique
>> names for properties/attributes, so in order to transmit multiple header
>> values (with a specific order) we introduce a new convention whereby a
>> C-style array syntax is used in the property name to denote multiple
>> ordered values for the same property.
>>
>> In this case we send multiple `wwwauth[n]` properties where `n` is a
>> zero-indexed number, reflecting the order the WWW-Authenticate headers
>> appeared in the HTTP response.
> 
> Here (and maybe in the cover letter) you mention `wwwauth[n]` and `n`...
>> +`wwwauth[]`::
>> +
>> +    When an HTTP response is received that includes one or more
>> +    'WWW-Authenticate' authentication headers, these can be passed to Git
>> +    (and subsequent credential helpers) with these attributes.
>> +    Each 'WWW-Authenticate' header value should be passed as a separate
>> +    attribute 'wwwauth[]' where the order of the attributes is the same
>> +    as they appear in the HTTP response.
> 
> ...but here you don't include the `n`.
> 
> [...]
>> +static void credential_write_strvec(FILE *fp, const char *key,
>> +                    const struct strvec *vec)
>> +{
>> +    int i = 0;
>> +    const char *full_key = xstrfmt("%s[]", key);
> 
> ...nor here.
> 
Ah. This is an oversight in my v2 rebasing! Will fix in v3.

Thanks,
Matthew



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux