Re: [PATCH v3] [OUTREACHY] t1002: modernize outdated conditional

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 14/10/2022 20:06, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 12:35 PM Derrick Stolee
>> <derrickstolee@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On 10/14/2022 12:15 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>>> "nsengaw4c via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>>> Cc: Christian Couder  <christian.couder@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> Cc: Hariom Verma <hariom18599@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> What are these C: lines for?  I do not think the message I am
>>>> responding to is Cc'ed to them.  There may be a special incantation
>>>> to tell GitGitGadget to Cc to certain folks, but adding Cc: to the
>>>> log message trailer like this does not seem to be it---at least it
>>>> appears that it did not work that way.
>>> GitGitGadget will read the "cc:" lines from the end of the pull request
>>> description, not the commit messages. I'm pretty sure they will be
>>> ignored if there are other lines after them.
>> For Wilberforce's edification for future submissions, presumably the
>> reason that the CC: in the pull-request's description didn't work is
>> because the CC: line wasn't the last line in the description? Does
>> there need to be a blank line before the CC: line? Is it okay to list
>> multiple people on the same CC: line as done in this case, or is that
>> also a problem?
> Ah, now I can see why the round v4 is CC'ed to you and Derrick on
> the list.  The pull-request text (visible in GitHub UI in the top
> most box of https://github.com/git/git/pull/1362) ends with two
> lines of cc: that list you two.  The one named Christian and Hariom
> were not at the end and was ignored by GGG, it seems.
>
I just want to throw in that because GitHub takes the PR & comitts
verbatim, but Git itself works via email, you can add description
portions to commits, and I believe the PR part, by add a line containing
just three dashes `---` followed by the additional descriptive note text
which won't be used when `am` (apply mailbox) is used.

I've certainly used that technique when sending patches. See the "Bonus
Chapter: One-Patch Changes" in MyFirstContribution.txt
--
Philip



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux