Hi, On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Wincent Colaiuta wrote: > El 12/10/2007, a las 13:37, Johannes Schindelin escribi?: > > > On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Wincent Colaiuta wrote: > > > > > El 11/10/2007, a las 22:53, David Kastrup escribi?: > > > > > > > Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > > > > > > Jonathan del Strother schrieb: > > > > > > How are you going to test that git works on paths with spaces if > > > > > > the > > > > > > test suite doesn't run there? > > > > > > > > > > By writing a specific test? > > > > > > > > This is going to be much less thorough. And it does no harm if the > > > > test scripts demonstrate defensive programming. > > > > > > +1: especially in this case, where it really is "defensive" and not > > > "paranoiac". > > > > I am all for it, _iff_ the guilty parties (and by that, I mean _you_) do > > it and keep maintaining it. See? Discussion closed already. > > How am *I* the guilty party? I'm merely endorsing David's comment that a > modicum of defensive programming isn't a bad thing; an eminently > reasonable position which is somewhat difficult to argue against. All I'm saying: let patches speak. Talk is cheap. Ciao, Dscho - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
