El 12/10/2007, a las 13:37, Johannes Schindelin escribió:
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Wincent Colaiuta wrote:
El 11/10/2007, a las 22:53, David Kastrup escribió:
Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Jonathan del Strother schrieb:
How are you going to test that git works on paths with spaces
if the
test suite doesn't run there?
By writing a specific test?
This is going to be much less thorough. And it does no harm if the
test scripts demonstrate defensive programming.
+1: especially in this case, where it really is "defensive" and not
"paranoiac".
I am all for it, _iff_ the guilty parties (and by that, I mean
_you_) do
it and keep maintaining it. See? Discussion closed already.
How am *I* the guilty party? I'm merely endorsing David's comment
that a modicum of defensive programming isn't a bad thing; an
eminently reasonable position which is somewhat difficult to argue
against.
Cheers,
Wincent
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
