On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 09:29:11AM +0200, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > > This will cause some mild hardships, as later patches will need to > > #define UNUSED in other spots, as well, in order to get full coverage of > > the code base (I have written those annotation patches, but they're not > > applied upstream yet). > > Sorry about any trouble in having to rebase those on UNUSED. That part was not too bad, and is already done. The trickiest part is that the headers get included in odd orders, and if the macros don't match, the compiler will complain (this has to do with compat/ headers which don't necessarily start by including git-compat-util.h). But if the definition gets much more complicated, then it's probably worth pulling it out rather than repeating it. > If you're taking requests it would be really useful to prioritize > changes to shared headers and the like, e.g. DEVOPTS=extra-all on pretty > much any file will start with: > > git-compat-util.h: In function ‘precompose_argv_prefix’: > git-compat-util.h:313:54: error: unused parameter ‘argc’ [-Werror=unused-parameter] > 313 | static inline const char *precompose_argv_prefix(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix) > | ~~~~^~~~ > git-compat-util.h:313:73: error: unused parameter ‘argv’ [-Werror=unused-parameter] > 313 | static inline const char *precompose_argv_prefix(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix) > | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~ > git-compat-util.h: In function ‘git_has_dos_drive_prefix’: > git-compat-util.h:423:56: error: unused parameter ‘path’ [-Werror=unused-parameter] > 423 | static inline int git_has_dos_drive_prefix(const char *path) > | ~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~ > git-compat-util.h: In function ‘git_skip_dos_drive_prefix’: > git-compat-util.h:431:52: error: unused parameter ‘path’ [-Werror=unused-parameter] > 431 | static inline int git_skip_dos_drive_prefix(char **path) Yeah, those are near the top of my list. I have a group classified as "trivial": functions which are compat placeholders and have no body. I'll be mostly offline for about a week, but I hope to send another round of unused-mark patches when I get back. (Of course it is not really useful until _all_ of the patches are there anyway). -Peff