"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 07/10/2007, Karl Hasselström <kha@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 2007-10-07 22:18:44 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: >> >> > How stable is the kha/experimental branch? Since there are more and >> > more bugs added to the tracking system, I'll have to start looking >> > at them before a 0.14 release. Is it worth merging the >> > kha/experimental now or we better wait for after 0.14? >> >> The idea is that experimental contains changes that need testing, but >> may not yet be ready for your master. (They are generally safe, >> though; I run StGit from my experimental branch at work, for example.) >> When I decide that they are ready, I move them to safe. If there are >> any patches you feel should be in safe rather than experimental, just >> ask. Or you could just take them directly from experimental without >> asking, of course. :-) > > OK. My plan is to merge kha/safe and have a look at what seems safer > to merge from kha/experimental. Fix bugs (and freeze the current > features). Release 0.14. Merge kha/experimental entirely post 0.14 and > test/stabilize it over couple of months. How does this sound? Sounds like a plan to me. But we should probably fix the loose ends in kha/experimental before merging it entirely. -- David Kågedal - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
