On 07/10/2007, Karl Hasselström <kha@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 2007-10-07 22:18:44 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > > How stable is the kha/experimental branch? Since there are more and > > more bugs added to the tracking system, I'll have to start looking > > at them before a 0.14 release. Is it worth merging the > > kha/experimental now or we better wait for after 0.14? > > The idea is that experimental contains changes that need testing, but > may not yet be ready for your master. (They are generally safe, > though; I run StGit from my experimental branch at work, for example.) > When I decide that they are ready, I move them to safe. If there are > any patches you feel should be in safe rather than experimental, just > ask. Or you could just take them directly from experimental without > asking, of course. :-) OK. My plan is to merge kha/safe and have a look at what seems safer to merge from kha/experimental. Fix bugs (and freeze the current features). Release 0.14. Merge kha/experimental entirely post 0.14 and test/stabilize it over couple of months. How does this sound? -- Catalin - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
