On Wed, Aug 31 2022, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > >> Yeah, I think we should use the deprecated attribute. Since the original >> has been reverted, I think the next step would be for me to fix up the >> patches to use that approach from the start, and re-submit. >> >> I was dragging my feet a little hoping that we might get some coccinelle >> parsing miracle in the interim. > > Yup, that was why I ignored the "deprecated" one when I dealt with > the replacement series yesterday. Ah, even if that's the case we'd need to start requiring bleeding-edge spatch, which doesn't seem practical to me, and would reduce the audience for our rules. Or we'd need to split off the "bleeding edge" rules, or something...
