Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > Yeah, I think we should use the deprecated attribute. Since the original > has been reverted, I think the next step would be for me to fix up the > patches to use that approach from the start, and re-submit. > > I was dragging my feet a little hoping that we might get some coccinelle > parsing miracle in the interim. Yup, that was why I ignored the "deprecated" one when I dealt with the replacement series yesterday.
