On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 12:01 PM Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
<avarab@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18 2022, Derrick Stolee wrote:
> > +test_ancestry () {
> > + args=$1
> > + expected=$2
>
> Maybe add &&-chaining here (we do it in some cases, but I'm not sure
> when such assignments would ever fail).
Assignment shouldn't fail, but keeping the &&-chain intact here
protects us against the unlikely event of someone inserting &&-chained
code above these assignments and not realizing that the &&-chain is
not intact at the assignment lines.
