Re: [PATCH 1/2] Make rebase.autostash default

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2022-08-18 at 14:00:30, Sergio via GitGitGadget wrote:
> From: Sergio <sergeikrivonos@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sergio <sergeikrivonos@xxxxxxxxx>

Typically you'll want to explain in the commit message why this is a
valuable change. For example, I don't have this option set and don't use
it, and I always stash my changes manually before rebasing.  You should
tell me why the user will benefit from this setting defaulting to
enabled, since I personally don't see a need for it.

You may also want to discuss why any pitfalls of stash, such as unadded
changes being added after a stash pop, are not problematic here and why
this behaviour won't be more surprising or annoying to experienced users
who are used to seeing an error message instead.

This isn't to say that the change is bad or we shouldn't accept it, only
that I (and others) need help understanding why it's a good change to make.
-- 
brian m. carlson (he/him or they/them)
Toronto, Ontario, CA

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux