Re: [PATCH 4/4] doc add: renormalize is not idempotent for CRCRLF

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I've unfortunately had some family issue which prevented me doing any work.

If I haven't managed anything by the end of the week. I'd be happy if
others took it forward.

On 05/08/2022 23:26, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.email> writes:
>
>>> How about this:
>>>
>>> This option implies `-u`. Lone CR characters are untouched. CRCRLF cleans to CRLF.
>> That is probably sufficient. It drops the awkward 'idempotent'. And
>> indicates this edge case, though doesn't highlight that the resultant
>> CRLF still leaves the file only partially renormalised.
>>
>> I'll reword.
> It's been a few weeks since the last activity on this topic.
> Anything you guys need unblocked to move forward?
>
> Thanks.
>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux