Re: [PATCH 4/4] doc add: renormalize is not idempotent for CRCRLF

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 03:26:10PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.email> writes:
>
> >> How about this:
> >>
> >> This option implies `-u`. Lone CR characters are untouched. CRCRLF cleans to CRLF.
> > That is probably sufficient. It drops the awkward 'idempotent'. And
> > indicates this edge case, though doesn't highlight that the resultant
> > CRLF still leaves the file only partially renormalised.
> >
> > I'll reword.
>
> It's been a few weeks since the last activity on this topic.
> Anything you guys need unblocked to move forward?
>
> Thanks.
>

Not from my point of view. My understanding is, that the short version is OK for
everybody:

This option implies `-u`. Lone CR characters are untouched. CRCRLF cleans to CRLF.

Is it OK to ask you for a local ammend to push this further ?




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux