Re: gc/bare-repo-discovery (was Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jul 2022, #03; Mon, 11))

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Wed, 13 Jul 2022, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Glen Choo <chooglen@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > I also noted your distaste for the `discovery.*` namespace (fair
> > enough). To avoid a reroll-of-the-reroll, I was hoping that we could
> > agree on something on-list (thread here [1]) before I send out the next
> > version.
>
> I found your idea of adding this new one in the safe.* hierarchy
> quite reasonable.  "safe.discoveredBareRepository = yes / no" may be
> quote a mouthful, but I do not think I can think of anything better.

I would find `safe.bareRepository = true` or `false` more intuitive, and
more concise.

And if there should be an option to ignore bare repositories when
discovering a Git repository, it could be a tristate, with `ignore` being
the value to trigger that mode.

Thanks,
Dscho




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux