Re: gc/bare-repo-discovery (was Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jul 2022, #03; Mon, 11))

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Glen Choo <chooglen@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I also noted your distaste for the `discovery.*` namespace (fair
> enough). To avoid a reroll-of-the-reroll, I was hoping that we could
> agree on something on-list (thread here [1]) before I send out the next
> version.

I found your idea of adding this new one in the safe.* hierarchy
quite reasonable.  "safe.discoveredBareRepository = yes / no" may be
quote a mouthful, but I do not think I can think of anything better.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux