>"lilinchao@xxxxxxxxxx" <lilinchao@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >>>I think the end-goal of having the "remote: " messages translated, if >>>possible, is very worthwhile, but I'd always imagined we'd do that with >>>a protocol extension, because even if we do this with HTTP headers we >>>won't get the same over ssh/git transports. >> >> As for ssh transport, can we use ssh environment to reach our goal? > >Not really. Before forcing us to invent completely separate >mechanisms for different transports, it is a very good idea to >consider if we can use a single mechanism that can apply to all >transports. Adding something at the protocol level would be a >step in the right direction. I wonder if we can use a new protocol-capability like local-lang or something else, then Git client and server can tell each other's language ability in the negotiation stage.
