"lilinchao@xxxxxxxxxx" <lilinchao@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >>I think the end-goal of having the "remote: " messages translated, if >>possible, is very worthwhile, but I'd always imagined we'd do that with >>a protocol extension, because even if we do this with HTTP headers we >>won't get the same over ssh/git transports. > > As for ssh transport, can we use ssh environment to reach our goal? Not really. Before forcing us to invent completely separate mechanisms for different transports, it is a very good idea to consider if we can use a single mechanism that can apply to all transports. Adding something at the protocol level would be a step in the right direction.
