Re: [PATCH] is_promisor_object(): walk promisor packs in pack-order

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/16/2022 2:54 AM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 02:07:41AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> 
>> Those rev-lists run in 1.7s and 224s respectively. Ouch!
> 
> Even though I expected the second one to be slow, I was shocked at just
> how slow it was. The patch below speeds it up by a factor of 2, and I
> think is worth applying separately, regardless of anything else being
> discussed in this thread.

I agree. It's extremely simple for the value it provides.

> diff --git a/packfile.c b/packfile.c
> index 8e812a84a3..ed69fe457b 100644
> --- a/packfile.c
> +++ b/packfile.c
> @@ -2275,7 +2275,8 @@ int is_promisor_object(const struct object_id *oid)
>  		if (has_promisor_remote()) {
>  			for_each_packed_object(add_promisor_object,
>  					       &promisor_objects,
> -					       FOR_EACH_OBJECT_PROMISOR_ONLY);
> +					       FOR_EACH_OBJECT_PROMISOR_ONLY |
> +					       FOR_EACH_OBJECT_PACK_ORDER);
>  		}

Thanks,
-Stolee




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux