Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Is bitmap-format the only one that is not fed to AsciiDoc, by the > way? Are there other 'text-only' document that is worth converting > to AsciiDoc? > > It is outside the scope of this series, of course, to actually > adjusting them, but since you are already doing the homework, I > thought you might already know the answer, which may become a source > of inspriation for others to find something to work on. No, bitmap-format is not the only one. There are more text-only files. Some of them which I found till now are - technical/chunk-format.txt, technical/commit-graph.txt etc. There are more but I don't know if they actually need html conversion. These two texts (which I mentioned) is I think worth having html files. I was thinking of adding those in my commit but later I thought it would divert the patch series. Thanks :)
