"Abhradeep Chakraborty via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > From: Abhradeep Chakraborty <chakrabortyabhradeep79@xxxxxxxxx> > > Documentation/Makefile does not include bitmap-format.txt to generate > a html page using asciidoc. > > Teach Documentation/Makefile to also generate a html page for > Documentation/technical/bitmap-format.txt file. > > Signed-off-by: Abhradeep Chakraborty <chakrabortyabhradeep79@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/Makefile | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) The change itself is obviously correct (assuming that it is worth passing the document to AsciiDoc, instead of reading it in text, that is). > diff --git a/Documentation/Makefile b/Documentation/Makefile > index d3f043f50d2..8d405a14330 100644 > --- a/Documentation/Makefile > +++ b/Documentation/Makefile > @@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ TECH_DOCS += MyFirstContribution > TECH_DOCS += MyFirstObjectWalk > TECH_DOCS += SubmittingPatches > TECH_DOCS += ToolsForGit > +TECH_DOCS += technical/bitmap-format > TECH_DOCS += technical/bundle-format > TECH_DOCS += technical/hash-function-transition > TECH_DOCS += technical/http-protocol Is bitmap-format the only one that is not fed to AsciiDoc, by the way? Are there other 'text-only' document that is worth converting to AsciiDoc? It is outside the scope of this series, of course, to actually adjusting them, but since you are already doing the homework, I thought you might already know the answer, which may become a source of inspriation for others to find something to work on. Thanks.
