Re: [RFC PATCH 03/15] reftable: don't memset() a NULL from failed malloc()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Yes, but I think in this case most of these are either 100% legitimate
> issues, or things where we'd like to e.g. add a BUG() assertion anyway,
> e.g. in the diff parsing case.

Where does that "BUG() assertion anyway" comes from?  What are we
protecting against?

I do not think such a BUG() added only for placating -fanalyzer
falls into "legitimate" category at all.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux