Re: [PATCH v4 3/7] scalar: validate the optional enlistment argument

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> Scalar is not (yet?) a Git command.
>
> "test-tool" isn't "git" either, so I think this argument is a
> non-starter.
>
> As the documentation for "test_must_fail" notes the distinction is
> whether something is "system-supplied". I.e. we're not going to test
> whether "grep" segfaults, but we should test our own code to see if it
> segfaults.
>
> The scalar code is code we ship and test, so we should use the helper
> that doesn't hide a segfault.
>
> I don't understand why you wouldn't think that's the obvious fix here,
> adding "scalar" to that whitelist is a one-line fix, and clearly yields
> a more useful end result than a test silently hiding segfaults.

FWIW, I don't, either.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux