Re: [PATCH v4 3/7] scalar: validate the optional enlistment argument

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Ævar,

On Fri, 20 May 2022, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:

>
> On Wed, May 18 2022, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> > Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >
> >>> +test_expect_success '`scalar [...] <dir>` errors out when dir is missing' '
> >>> +	! scalar run config cloned 2>err &&
> >>
> >> Needs to use test_must_fail, not !
> >
> > Good eyes and careful reading are very much appreciated, but in this
> > case, doesn't such an improvement depend on an update to teach
> > test_must_fail_acceptable about scalar being whitelisted?
>
> Yes, I think so (but haven't tested it just now), but it's a relatively
> small change to t/test-lib-functions.sh.

Let it be noted that I fully agree with Junio that good eyes and careful
reading are very much appreciated. And that in this case, that would have
implied noticing that `test_must_fail` is reserved for Git commands.

Scalar is not (yet?) a Git command.

Ciao,
Johannes

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux