David Härdeman <david@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 08:53:01PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: >>also sprach David Härdeman <david@xxxxxxxxxxx> [2007.09.19.2016 +0100]: >>> But I agree, if any changes were made to git, I'd advocate adding >>> arbitrary attributes to files (much like xattrs) in name=value >>> pairs, then any extended metadata could be stored in those >>> attributes and external scripts/tools could use them in some way >>> that makes sense...and also make sure to only update them when it >>> makes sense. >> >>So where would those metdata be stored in your opinion? > > I'm not sufficiently versed in the internals of git to have an > informed opinion :) I think we have something like a length count for file names in index and/or tree. We could just put the (sorted) attributes after a NUL byte in the file name and include them in the count. It would also make those artificially longer file names work more or less when sorting them for deltification. However, this requires implementing _policies_: it must be possible to specify per repository exactly what will and what won't get tracked, or one will get conflicts that are not necessary or appropriate. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
