Elijah Newren <newren@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On v2 you said, "There are a few things that I found questionable, but > they were mostly documentation issues". You brought up several points > in v2 where my wording in the Documentation was admittedly suboptimal, > though I think I addressed all of those in v3. Correct. The above is all assuming that "cone is the future" is what is shared by the population that depends on sparse-checkout. I do not have strong opinions to declare that, but to help the topic move forward, I was giving reviews under the condition, i.e. "If there is such a concensus, here are the things in your current iteration that would need to be addressed". I vaguely recall there were folks who didn't like the change of default the last time you brought this topic up. Convincing them is not my job---it is yours. Mine has been to help prepare the code ready for public consumption when that happens.
