Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 5/2/2022 6:27 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> * ds/sparse-colon-path (2022-04-26) 5 commits >> - rev-parse: integrate with sparse index >> - object-name: diagnose trees in index properly >> - object-name: reject trees found in the index >> - show: integrate with the sparse index >> - t1092: add compatibility tests for 'git show' >> >> "git show :<path>" learned to work better with the sparse-index >> feature. >> >> Will merge to 'next'? >> source: <pull.1207.v2.git.1651005800.gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> > > I think this is stable and ready to go. Unless anyone else wanted to > take a stab at reviewing it. I think we've got good eyes on it already. Thanks. I read over the conversions and they all looked sensible. >> * en/sparse-cone-becomes-default (2022-04-21) 9 commits >> - Documentation: some sparsity wording clarifications >> - git-sparse-checkout.txt: mark non-cone mode as deprecated >> - git-sparse-checkout.txt: flesh out pattern set sections a bit >> - git-sparse-checkout.txt: add a new EXAMPLES section >> - git-sparse-checkout.txt: shuffle some sections and mark as internal >> - git-sparse-checkout.txt: update docs for deprecation of 'init' >> - git-sparse-checkout.txt: wording updates for the cone mode default >> - sparse-checkout: make --cone the default >> - tests: stop assuming --no-cone is the default mode for sparse-checkout >> >> Deprecate non-cone mode of the sparse-checkout feature. >> >> Will merge to 'next'? >> source: <pull.1148.v3.git.1650594746.gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> > > This has been quite stable and I'd like to see it merge early in the > release cycle in case that catches anything during local testing. This one I am not worried about stability all that much; I am more worried about breaking those who do not believe in "cone is the future" and managing their expectations. Thanks.
