On 4/8/2022 5:15 AM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 07 2022, Derrick Stolee wrote: >> Ævar: I'm still waiting on the full version of this. While you >> updated [1] your original RFC [2], it was incomplete. I am still >> looking forward to seeing your full vision of how it works with >> incremental fetch and how your optimizations to download only the >> headers of the bundles will work. >> >> [1] [RFC PATCH v2 00/13] bundle-uri: a "dumb CDN" for git >> https://lore.kernel.org/git/RFC-cover-v2-00.13-00000000000-20220311T155841Z-avarab@xxxxxxxxx/ >> >> [2] [RFC PATCH 00/13] Add bundle-uri: resumably clones, static "dumb" CDN etc. >> https://lore.kernel.org/git/RFC-cover-00.13-0000000000-20210805T150534Z-avarab@xxxxxxxxx/ >> >>> 2. Ævar will then do a round of taking both series and combining >>> them in a way that allows the union of possible functionality >>> to work. >> >> Or perhaps you are jumping straight to this part? > > Yeah, that was part of it... > >>> 3. As these things come out, I will make it a priority to read the >>> patches and provide feedback focusing on high-level concepts >>> and ways we can split the future, non-RFC series into chunks >>> that provide incremental functionality while keeping review >>> easier than reading the whole series. >> >> I'm still looking forward to seeing progress in this area. Please >> let me know what your plan is here. > > Hi. I'm sorry about the delay, I ran into various life/software things, > and found that this topic required a lot of continuous "sit down for a > day and work on it" attention from me v.s. some other topics where I'd > deal with interruption better. > > Then I was hoping that the merger of your bundle.c changes would come a > bit earlier before the rc, but they pretty much coincided, and since the > rc dropped I've been hesitant to send a very large topic to the list > (c.f. e.g. [1]). > > Maybe I should just bite the bullet and submit it anyway, what do you > think? > > 1. https://lore.kernel.org/git/nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.2204071407160.347@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ We could err on the side of not distracting from the list. I tend to think the release phase can be a good time to talk about an RFC, since Junio can ignore the thread until it is actually ready for full review. At minimum, I appreciate knowing your progress. I can be patient for a few more weeks as long as I have confidence that it will be shared as soon as external blockers are cleared. Thanks! -Stolee
